The Deficit Model of Parenting
and the End of Gratitude
I hope you had a good weekend. Went to the SF Symphony Friday night and heard Debussy’s Afternoon of a Faun which is such a beautiful piece of music. I’ve listened to it many times but never live which is always a richer experience. They also played Camille Saint-Saëns Piano Concerto No. 5, Egyptian which I hadn’t heard before and Berlioz’s Symphonie fantastique!
***
One of the things that I often see missing in the correspondence from estranged adult children is some expression of gratitude for what the parent actually provided to them both as children and often as adults.
Increasingly, that evaluation follows a framework where the relationship is judged primarily by what was missing, insufficient, or imperfect—while what was given, often over many years, recedes into the background or disappears entirely.
In this model, the question isn’t What did I receive? It’s What didn’t I get that I now believe I should have?
The Rise of the Deficit Lens
In an article I wrote for The Washington Post: How Soulmate Parenting Hurts Parent-Child Relationships, I discussed the error in assuming that parents have the power to always create a psychologically happy and healthy adult child.
That’s because all children grow up with some degree of unmet needs. No parent—no matter how loving, attuned, or psychologically informed—can perfectly anticipate, interpret, and respond to a child’s inner world.
That’s not failure. That’s the human condition. In addition, children bring their own challenges to the family that can make parenting especially difficult or fraught.
But in today’s therapeutic culture, ordinary limitations are increasingly reframed as injuries. Gaps in attunement become “emotional neglect.” Misattunements become “trauma.” Moments of parental imperfection become evidence of deeper dysfunction.
The result is a subtle but powerful shift where normal developmental disappointments are no longer something to integrate—they become something to indict.
And once a parent is cast primarily as the source of what was missing, the relationship begins to reorganize around grievance, distance, and self-protection.
Overreacting to What Was Missing
In estrangement, I often see adult children assign disproportionate weight to what they didn’t receive—especially when those perceived deficits are interpreted through contemporary psychological language.
A parent who struggled with emotional expression becomes someone who “withheld love.”
A parent who worked long hours to support the family becomes someone who “chose career over family.”
A parent who set limits becomes “controlling.”
These interpretations aren’t always wrong. But they are often incomplete.
What gets lost is proportion.
The hundreds or thousands of ordinary, sustaining acts—meals made, rides given, worries carried, sacrifices absorbed—fade into the background. What remains is a distilled narrative of parental failure.
It’s as if the relationship is being evaluated not as a whole, but as a list of deficits.
Under-Reacting to What Was Given
At the same time, there’s often a striking minimization of what the parent did provide.
Care becomes “the bare minimum.”
Provision becomes “what you’re supposed to do.”
Sacrifice becomes invisible.
Gratitude, in this framework, is seen as unnecessary—or even suspect. To acknowledge what was given can feel, to some adult children, like a betrayal of what was missing.
So they don’t.
And over time, the absence of gratitude becomes not just a byproduct of estrangement, but one of its sustaining forces.
Because gratitude does something psychologically important: it complicates the narrative.
It forces us to hold two truths at once—that we were both loved and hurt, both given to and deprived of.
The deficit model resists that complexity. It prefers clarity, even if that clarity is achieved by flattening the relationship into a single moral conclusion.
The Cultural Backdrop
This shift doesn’t happen in a vacuum.
We are living in a moment that elevates personal experience as the ultimate authority. If something felt harmful, it was harmful. If something felt insufficient, it was insufficient.
There is value in that. Many people grew up in environments where their experiences were minimized or dismissed. Others where real abuse and neglect occurred.
But when subjective experience becomes the only metric, we lose something equally important: the ability to evaluate relationships in context.
Parents are no longer seen as people shaped by their own histories, limitations, and constraints—but as providers of psychological goods who can be evaluated based on performance.
And like any provider, they can be judged as having failed to deliver.
Without these, relationships become more brittle.
More easily broken.
More difficult to repair.
A More Balanced Frame
None of this is to suggest that parents shouldn’t take responsibility where it’s warranted. Many should—and reconciliation often depends on their ability to do so.
But responsibility isn’t the same as totalization.
A more balanced frame asks a different set of questions:
What did I receive, even if it wasn’t everything I needed?
What were my parent’s limitations—and where did they come from?
How do I hold both appreciation and disappointment at the same time?
This is harder work than adopting a deficit model. It requires maturity, nuance, and a willingness to move beyond a purely self-referential lens.
But it also opens the door to something the deficit model often closes off:
The possibility of repair.
The Quiet Role of Gratitude
Gratitude, in this context, isn’t about denying pain or excusing harm.
It’s about restoring proportion.
It’s about recognizing that most parents are neither heroes nor villains—but flawed human beings who gave what they could, when they could, in the ways they knew how.
And that what they gave, even if imperfect, still matters.
In families where gratitude has disappeared entirely, reconciliation becomes much harder. Not impossible—but harder.
Because without some recognition of what was received, there’s very little foundation left to build on.
Closing Thought
One of the central tasks of adulthood is learning to see our parents more fully—not just as sources of what we lacked, but as participants in a relationship that contained both giving and failing.
The deficit model narrows that vision.
Gratitude widens it.
And in that widening, there is often more room—not just for understanding, but for the possibility of finding one another again.
I’ll be doing a Zoom webinar tomorrow night, Tuesday Mar 31
HEALING THE PAIN OF ESTRANGEMENT
430 PM, Pacific
LECTURE FOLLOWED BY Q AND A
RECORDED AND AVAILABLE FOR REPLAY.
REGISTER HERE
NOTE: This is part of my Tuesday Night Webinar series for estranged parents and is separate from the Deep Dive Sessions I do for Substack paid subscribers. You can learn more and order previously recorded Tuesday Night webinars here
Wow,wow,wow. Thank you for putting into perspective, in a most clarifying way, a stunning description of what people just don’t talk about, and likely haven’t even considered. I can not even begin to express my gratitude for this essay ❤️
Yes, each time I hear an adult say they were kept warm, were well fed, always had clean clothes that fit, summer camp, birthday parties, soccer club and an education but they "never felt loved," I feel nothing but disgust. The fact that they can say such a thing in all seriousness... there's no fixing that. That is an unreasonable human being at the core.